Accelerating numerical simulation campaigns.

A design study involves solving many closely related numerical problems in succession. Our technology exploits this similarity to reuse information from previous simulations and reduce the cost of the next ones.

In maturation with Inria

Reuse information from previous simulations to accelerate the next ones.

In a design study, the same problem is solved many times while varying a few parameters: geometry, material, loading. These computations are strongly related, yet this similarity is still underused. The computational cost accumulates over the course of the campaign and, in practice, limits the design space engineers can explore.

Our approach operates at the scale of the entire simulation campaign rather than on an isolated solver.

Reuse

Instead of treating each simulation independently, we reuse information from previous computations to accelerate the next ones.

Validate

Each computational gain is evaluated by checking that the result remains relevant and sufficiently accurate for the intended use.

Compare

The gain is measured directly on your use case by comparing our approach with your reference computational method.

How we measure gains

We evaluate each method against a reference computation performed under comparable conditions. We also check the accuracy of the results and retain the information required to reproduce the campaign.

01

Reference computation

Performance is compared with the computational method usually used on the same problem.

02

Result validation

A gain is only retained if the result satisfies the criteria defined for the study.

03

Traceability

The parameters, results, and decisions from a campaign are recorded so that they can be analyzed and reproduced.

Computation runs within your environment.

Your geometries, your materials and your results stay strictly within your environment.

Simulation campaigns across several fields of engineering.

Our approach addresses studies in which a series of simulations explores close variants of the same problem: geometry, material, loading or operating conditions.

Thermal and cooling

Sizing heat sinks, cooling channels or microchannels. Optimisation means testing many geometries, each time evaluating temperatures, fluxes and pressure losses.

Scientific example — 3D optimization of liquid-cooled heat sinks, solving the Navier-Stokes equations together with heat transfer.

View an example from the scientific literature

Structural mechanics

Lightening a part, optimising its stiffness or its mechanical strength. Every variant requires recomputing displacements, stresses and sizing criteria.

Scientific example — Topology optimization of structures to reduce mass under displacement and mechanical stress constraints.

View an example from the scientific literature

Acoustics

Optimising mufflers, expansion chambers or acoustic ducts. One geometry is modified step by step and evaluated across frequencies to improve its attenuation.

Scientific example — Finite-element shape optimization of a muffler to maximize transmission loss over a range of frequencies.

View an example from the scientific literature

Fluid dynamics and aerodynamics

Ducts, diffusers, exchangers: the flow governs performance. Every shape variant calls for a fresh computation of the velocity and pressure fields, and of the associated pressure losses.

Scientific example — Shape optimization of an automotive air-conditioning duct using CFD, with the CAD geometry used directly as the design space.

View an example from the scientific literature

Shape optimization spans all four of these domains.

When geometry itself is a design variable, each modification to the CAD model requires a new simulation and, depending on the method, an update or reconstruction of the mesh. This is among the most computationally expensive types of campaigns and one where reuse across simulations can provide the greatest benefit.

Product development

We are progressing step by step, from the current demonstrator to validation on industrial cases and then deployment within users' computational environments.

Today

Demonstrator

We have a demonstrator that can define, execute, and evaluate simulation campaigns across several families of problems.

Industrial validation

Studies with partners

The next step is to test our approach on existing industrial studies, under the same computational conditions and with the same accuracy requirements.

Deployment

Integration into computational environments

Our goal is to deploy the infrastructure directly within users' computational environments and integrate it with their existing simulation tools.

Where we are today

The product is still under development. We currently have a demonstrator that we present on request. If you run parametric studies and computational cost is a limiting factor, we can discuss your use case.

Request a demonstration

Interested in this problem? Come work on it with us.

Numerical analysis, high-performance computing, machine learning, scientific software engineering.

Stay informed

Our technical updates and publications. No marketing emails.

We do not share your email address.

Explore
Home Technology About Careers Press & news Contact
Follow us
LinkedIn X
Legal
Legal notice Privacy policy Cookie policy Credits
Find us

Inria Saclay
École polytechnique campus
1 rue Honoré d’Estienne d’Orves
91120 Palaiseau, France

contact@cartanlabs.fr
© 2026 CartanLabs. All rights reserved.
Project supported in its maturation phase by Inria